Key Takeaways from IMC Panel

North Central ACH hosted a panel discussion to share their region’s knowledge and experiences regarding IMC transitioning. Below are the key takeaways BHT staff noted from the discussion.


Top Tips

  • Contract negotiation is key. Negotiate the contract you want with MCO’s!  Understand that they need you. 
  • Have money in the bank. Providers, both behavioral health and primary care, suggest that organizations either have built up reserves or a line of credit to continue operations if payment becomes delayed. 
  • Higher consultants. Strongly recommend working with a consultant to help with contracts.
  • One thing at a time. Don’t recommend switching EHR/billing etc. systems at the same time as transitioning to IMC.
  • Think about your EHR. When/If organizations change or implement an EHR, it was strongly recommended that the system that you choose is able to talk with EPIC which most primary care systems/providers use.
  • Keep documenting. The MCO’s are not requiring the same demographic/client data that the RSN/BHO’s have but providers recommend to continue tracking, gathering, and keeping it anyhow. This is due to license requirements, and not knowing if the data will be required at some point in the future. North Central providers suggest having clinical staff operate as if nothing has changed in regards to clinical documentation. Providers do note that in working with the MCO’s there are less requirements overall in comparison to working with RSN/BHO’s. Less audits/monitoring etc.
  • Keep staff informed. Since individuals on Apple Health can switch plans monthly, it was recommended that providers implement much more eligibility and billing oversight. Front line staff need to be really cognizant. There needs to be organizational tolerance and support for trial and error. Train staff who know how to work with MCO’s and then work with the patients-in regards to switching plans, as individuals will have lots of questions and staff need to be able to stay informed.
  • Build relationships. Start building a list from the MCO’s of who does what at the MCO’s, key contacts, and build those relationships so that there are reliable contacts to answer questions and support the organization.
     

The Bright Side

  • This transition has built great collaboration and has allowed agency case managers to do other things. 
  • This transition has been an additional benefit that organizations did not anticipate. 
  • Working together (BH, PC, SDOH) has really made a difference and improved relationships, referrals, and partnerships.
  • Spokane providers can reach out to other providers in the North Central region—they are willing to be a resource!!!
     

MCO Specific

  • The MCOs offer good care coordination—driven by their desire to keep costs down. 
  • The MCOs have very active care managers that are doing great to connect and work with folks. 
  • The MCOs have been very quick with responses to requests and are very interested in being creative—they have lots of flexible funding. (In Grant county they developed a mobile office/outreach that goes around the county to serve individuals.)
  • The MCOs are willing to sponsor trainings/community events. 
  • The MCO’s support creativity and would like things to be different and work better.  Start asking! (Providers). 
  • MCO releases didn’t/don’t meet part two CFR/HIPAA standards.
  • The MCO’s have brought together an advisory committee to discuss coordination, gaps, what’s working.
     

We wish we had known: 

  • Contract negotiation and the power that providers hold—should have hired a consultant. 
  • Understanding and knowing the State dollar side and processes (Beacon-BH-ASO). 
  • To involve as many staff as possible.
  • What’s going will impact everyone in the organization—keep everyone informed. 
  • Leadership and organization be need to be available and attuned to staff frustrations and concerns and offer support, so they can answer questions to clients. 
  • Understanding authorizations and the process(s). 
  • Staff will need to understand medical necessity. 
  • Ask for information from the MCO’s/payers. 
  • The MCO’s don’t know everything—do your own research and advocate for your organization. 
  • To negotiate and push back. 
  • This looks very different from the RSN/BHO environment. 
  • How much you will need keep staff informed!  
  • You may need to add staff (IT)—don’t assume that current staff can do what’s needed going forward. 
  • Will need to be flexible with staff, change is constant and staff may shift. 
  • You will want to have specific contacts within each of the MCO’s—building connections and relationship will be valuable.
  • You don’t have to accept Medicaid contracts. 
  • Look 3-5 years out and look strategically and be able to demonstrate value to MCO’s otherwise there will be less providers as organizations didn’t prepare and can’t respond to the new environment. 
  • Clinically organizations should keep status quo and focus on the billing and data submission piece. 

Access to Care

Has reduced barriers and reduced time to get folks into care.  Family members who didn’t meet access to care-now the whole family can be served by the same provider.  The MCO’s use Medical Necessity only-there are no levels. Clinicians decide who needs services. MCO don’t require specific assessment ( *CHPW Locus and cal-Locus*)   
 

VBP

Still working on details. Only measure now, “how many BH patients are seeing their primary care physician.” Define for yourselves (organization). Very vague and negotiable at this time.  Providers need to consider, “how much do we want to assume (diabetics etc) to increase capitated rates” as the more organizations assume the more money they can earn.

Providers in the North Central region have found that primary care is responding to behavioral health and connections. More aware and want loop closed—did person they refer get seen? 
 

Data sharing

Still a work in progress. NC has a specific workgroup. Some data sharing going on between certain organizations. Get in front of data asap and work with the MCO’s who have created/offered some innovative and creative solutions. Share needs and barriers with them!

    IMC Workgroups

    Three workgroups have been established to help move the work forward.

    1. Early Warning System: Develop recommendations for an Early Warning System that allows a feedback loop and triage process to identify and resolve system issues as they arise.

    2. IT/EHR: Identify and resolve IT/EHR issues including but not limited to MCO/ASO billing capacity, EHR compatibility, provider data reporting requirements, technical assistance needed by providers.

    3. Communications: Provide recommendations and work to engage the consumer sector in system change efforts related in integrated managed care. Ensure that consumers maintain confidence and continuity in the care they are receiving. Ensure smooth transition to IMC through the development of clear communication materials, client notifications, and transparent transition processes.

    Composition: Open to any Spokane, Pend Oreille, Stevens, Ferry, Lincoln, and Adams stakeholders who are interested in participating.  Representation from the following organizations will be strongly encouraged.

    Authority: These are not a decision-making bodies, but will provide recommendations that will ensure concerns surrounding IMC are addressed and resolved in the Spokane region.

    Meetings: Held no less than monthly through January 2019. All meetings will have an option to participate via teleconference for those unable to attend in person. BHT staff, in collaboration with workgroup members, HCA and the SCRBHO, shall be responsible for establishing the agenda. Notes for all meetings will be provided by BHT staff within two weeks of each meeting.

    BHT Board supports mid-adoption of FIMC

    In 2014 the Washington state legislature passed 2SSB 6312 that requires integration of behavioral health benefits into the Apple Health managed care program by 2020. Additionally, this provided a road map for integration, that included the transition from a Regional Service Network to Behavioral Health Organizations. Spokane County serves as our region’s Behavioral Health Organization and has done a tremendous job integrating our mental health and substance abuse services through Adams, Lincoln, Stevens, Pend Oreille, Ferry, and Spokane Additionally, Okanogan county selected to receive BHO services from Spokane but will ultimately be transitioned to North Central no later than January 1, 2020.

    Additionally, the legislation provided a provision for early and mid-adopter regions. Southwest, comprised of Clark and Skamania counties, were the only region in the state to select to be an early adopter. This region launched fully integrated managed care in April 2016 after a RFP process that selected Molina and Community Health Plan of Washington.

    Late in 2016, North Central, comprised of Chelan, Douglas and Grant counties, announced their intention to be mid-adopters. North Central is currently in their RFP process, all 5 Managed Care plans are applying and we expect to have an announcement in mid-May of the selected 2-3 plans.

    On April 10, the HCA released new incentive information for region’s willing to be mid-adopters. For our region, this would mean $8.7 million dollars for investment in providers to prepare for fully integrated managed care (FIMC). In order to trigger the investment, step one is for each county’s Commissioners to submit a binding letter of intent by September 1, 2017.

    There is current legislative movement occurring, in which the Spokane BHO is active, to shift the integration deadline beyond 2020, carve out a specific role for BHOs moving forward, and provide a mechanism for BHOs to have a right of first refusal for the Behavioral Health Administrative Role that will deliver crises services, administer certain non-Medicaid funding sources and other negotiable regional functions. Additionally, the state legislature still needs to adopt a policy to move current funding from DSHS to Health Care Authority. This is currently still active legislation.

    BHT Board Decision

    As noted above, this is a decision for each of our region’s County Commissioners to make. BHT could adopt a policy and direct BHT staff to provide information and advocacy to partners and Commissioners to assist in encouraging our region to be a mid-adopter of FIMC.

    APPROVED MOTION:

    To actively support moving the BHT ACH region to FIMC by 2019 in order to trigger a $8.7-million-dollar investment and accelerate our efforts to move to whole person care.

    Question: Does basic Medicare cover regular dental visits?

    Question:

    Does basic Medicare cover regular dental visits?
    A)    Yes
    B)    No
    C)    I’m not sure…

    If you answered A or C, you aren’t alone, as a recent Washington Dental Service Foundation survey showed 51% of respondents in Spokane believe Medicare covers dental. However, you would be wrong.

    Correct answer: B) No, basic Medicare does not cover dental, and a lot of folks entering retirement are learning that the hard way. A recent article in The Spokesman Review talks about what steps folks approaching retirement should take for their oral health.

    Good oral health relates to a lot more than just our teeth; our ability to chew effects the nutrition we receive, our ability to smile effects our confidence, and chronic conditions like Type 2 Diabetes can exacerbate dental decay.

    Organizations like Smile Spokane, WDSF’s The Mighty Mouth, and our own DENT program are helping connect folks to the dental care they need, but for lasting change, we need a health care system that includes our mouths as part of our overall health. That’s why the BHT ACH has set full integration of Oral, Physical, and Behavioral health systems as one of our region’s main priorities. 

    Read the Spokesman article to learn more:
    http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2016/aug/08/financial-decay-dental-care-can-threaten-retiremen/